| ISS45 | Release Table |
| |
Name of Link: | CD-ROM |
| Code Distribution: | The Code Distribution version of 8.1.4.0 is being held back pending its ability to install .NET automatically prior to the code update. This is planned for completion in late May. | |
| Posting Date: | 07-May-09 | |
|
Last modified May 9, 2009 This release supersedes 8.1.3.2, which will not go to general release. All 8.1.3.2 features have been put into this release and are listed here. See the Release Table below for a description of this planned release. This table below describes the current plan for the new features and faults to be addressed in this scheduled software release. While StoreNext endeavors to provide the most accurate scheduling and listing possible, no commitments to dealers or users are made by the provision of this information. |
||
|
Enhancement or Fault Number |
Item Description |
|
| E. R. 807030701 | Enable manual entry of Tax Exempt I.D. (8.1.3.2-050) | |
| E. R. 811280601 | Omit weight and unit price on receipt (8.1.3.2-050) | |
| E. R. 811280602 | Add beep on good weight for scanning - this feature is ONLY NCR scanners (8.1.3.2-050) | |
| E. R. 808270701 | Promotions and Pricing by Checkout Banks - allow up to 5 different prices for the same PLU controlled by Checkout Banks (8.1.3.2-050) | |
| E. R. 806280706 | Loss Prevention � Secure Mode/Sign Off by Checkout Bank (8.1.3.2-050) | |
| E. R. 806280706 | Pharmacy - add ability to scan RX barcode for Script Number and Price (specific format only see specification) Not all Pharmacy systems (8.1.3.2-050) | |
| New Feature | The cashier accountability report does not have the Over/Short amount in the last column like Version 7 (8.1.3.2-050) | |
| New Feature | Administration Rights change � capability to run servers without being signed in as Admin (8.1.3.2-050) | |
| New Feature | Add ability to support two USB scanners � one handheld and one desktop on the TeamPoS 3000 � change to hardware configuration. (8.1.3.2-050) | |
| New Feature | Security TCP/IP functionality (CCTV) � this is done in V7 (8.1.3.2-050) | |
|
New Feature
|
This release ***requires*** that .NET 2.0 be installed as a prerequisite. Please also note below the prerequisites for the .NET Installer as well. *** There will be a DataBarEngine startup error if there are NO devices or emulators installed.
System Requirements for the .NET Installer to work:
|
|
| New Feature |
Set up the CCTV in the system and could not connect to CCTV server. The register could not be used because the register could not run without CCTV connected. Scenario: 1. Set up CCTV in v7 screen 6.4.8 #1 CCTV in system checked #2 CCTV Server Host Name 216.254.142.83 #3 CCTV Server Port 5111 Make sure the register has a valid address to access the network If you try to use the register and it can not connect to CCTV, you can not sign on because the register is running too slow. You can see the 2 x 20 pole display scroll this lane is closed and stops then starts again. Expected Results: With CCTV not able to connect, the register should still be able to be used Actual Results: The register can not be use if CCTV can not establish a connection |
|
| New Feature | Use the CALL from WinEPS to tell Microtrax the version of ISS45 to assist with upgrades for Connected Payments | |
| New Feature |
WinEPS � fuel zip code verification is complete end to end |
|
| New Feature |
When both MFS1 and MFS2 are logged off we have trouble with the EOD starting on time. It usually starts about 20 minutes late. |
|
| WD 7370 | Cashier is not prompted to select a pump once they have entered in the amount or volume in a preset fuel transaction. The transaction does work if you select a pump. | |
| WD 8103 |
If we failed to create instance to connect to SQL, we don't try again. And from this point on, every SQL statement will be rejected with an error. Expected Results: SQL statements will be processed even if in the initial stage connection to SQL was not available. Actual Results: Once the instance to create a connection is not available, all statements will be rejected. (8.1.3.2-050) |
|
| WD 8751 |
If the Print Item Number flag, buffered printing, and combine same items are all turned on, the receipt prints incorrectly. Scenario:1. Turn on buffered printing 2. Turn on combine same items 3. Turn on sort receipt 4. Create two items, PLU #1 and #2 5. Turn on "Print item number" flag on both items. 6. Ring 5 qty #1, 8 qty #2, 5 qty #17. Total the order Expected Results: The receipt prints correctly Actual Results: The receipt prints incorrectly |
|
| WD 8970 |
Cashier Declaration Report prints wrong data if printed immediately after performing the declaration (8.1.3.2-050) |
|
| WD 8976 |
"5 Invalid procedure call or argument" when save PLU Selection Criteria. Must have no records to reproduce. Scenario: 1. General System Parameters - Store/Front Office/PLU and Batch/Operation/Allow Ordering of PLU Selection Criteria=Yes 2. PLU Management - PLU Selection Criteria 3. Click Save PLU Selection Criteria Expected Results: Does nothing if no existing records. Actual Results: Error message. (8.1.3.2-050) |
|
| WD 9205 | Fuel - The receipt is printing incorrectly when change is due on a Recall Pre-pay fuel transaction with buffer print ON. The change amount prints at the top of the ticket, Cash -$5.00 prints below and a change line with $0.00 print at the end. | |
| WD 9207 | 'When a manual credit card prompt appears only the top 1/3 of the amount total is visible (8.1.3.2-050) | |
| WD 9296 |
Fuel - Error loading wetstock for pospump Scenario: 1. Exception !!! in FTI::m_frm_EventpbWetStockClick - Component 'PrjTankCtrl.ocx' or one of its dependencies not correctly registered: a file is missing or invalid - Error Number: 339 |
|
| WD 9411 | The Hourly Productivity Report shows the wrong number of Active POS (8.1.3.2-050) | |
| WD 9440 |
When there is a Path located in the General System parameter "Path for PLU movement Extract" the extract does not go to this location. Scenario: 1. Log into Front Office and go to General System parameters 2. go to Store-> Front Office-> EOD-> Period-> "Path for PLU movement Extract" 3. Set a path to anywhere on that drive that is not C:\Program Files\Posware\Office\Export 4. Run SLExtrct.exe 5. No Movement was extracted. Expected Results: When there is a Path in the General System Parameter "Path for PLU movement Extract" it should extract to the path entered when running SLExtrct.exe Actual Results: When there is a Path in the General System Parameter "Path for PLU movement Extract" it does not extract to this path when running SLExtrct.exe. If the path in General System Parameters under Store-> Front Office-> EOD-> Period-> "Path for PLU movement Extract" is blank the Extract works fine and extracts the file to C:\Program Files\Posware\Office\Export |
|
| WD 9519 | If you set screen 6.1.4.1 - to none for printing a LOGO. Then if a clerk 'saves' an order and then continues to another order and processes a check - the printing on the front of the check will consistently print almost off the top of the check. The only quick fix is to turn the printer on/off and the template will correct. The long term 'workaround' is to create a logo that is just the customer name and call this logo as if it is a header. Note: you must remove the customer name from the header not to have duplicate names. By using the logo the problem is never seen (8.1.3.2-050) | |
| WD 9801 |
RSS-14 Expanded Weight Label Displays incorrectly on Receipt Scenario:. -- Set up item 9005161100113 in the PLU file with a price of $3.49 and flag as a weighed item - Make sure your scanner can read RSS-14 expanded labels before doing the test - Start the order and scan the label - The information on the receipt looks correct - Change the price of the PLU in the item file to $1.25 - Start another order and scan the label - The correct price and weight is picked up from the label but the 1.25/ lb is picked up from the item file making the receipt appear to calculate wrong. Expected Results: I believe that a price/lb should be calculated based on the price and weight embedded in the RSS-14 expanded label. It the price/lb is used from the item file it will be wrong if the price has been change since the label was printed Actual Results: Using price/ lb from the item file which if changed will make the receipt look and calculate wrong. |
|
| WD 10100 |
Saving and Recalling an order with a Delayed Promo does not discount correctly Scenario: 1. Set up an Enhanced Delayed Member Promotion linked by Department. Set Group Type = Units Reward Type = Percent Off Order Reward = 10.000 Member Card Required 2. Ring 5.00 grocery Press ENTER to total. Promo discount reduces transaction by .50. Total is 4.50. Press CLEAR to return to item entry. Ring 6.00 produce. Press ENTER to total. Promo discount reduces transaction by .60. Total is 9.90. Press CLEAR to return to item entry. Press SAVE. Press RECALL and recall transaction Total is 9.90 Press CLEAR to return to item entry. Press ENTER to total. Total is still 9.90. Press CLEAR to return to item entry. Ring 2.00 dairy. Press ENTER to total. Promo discount reduces transaction by 1.19. Total is 10.71. Promo should only have taken off an additional .20 resulting in a total of 11.70. Expected Results: Total should have been 11.70 (8.1.3.2-050) |
|
| WD 9801 |
RSS-14 Expanded Weight Label Displays incorrectly on Receipt Scenario:. -- Set up item 9005161100113 in the PLU file with a price of $3.49 and flag as a weighed item - Make sure your scanner can read RSS-14 expanded labels before doing the test - Start the order and scan the label - The information on the receipt looks correct - Change the price of the PLU in the item file to $1.25 - Start another order and scan the label - The correct price and weight is picked up from the label but the 1.25/ lb is picked up from the item file making the receipt appear to calculate wrong. Expected Results: I believe that a price/lb should be calculated based on the price and weight embedded in the RSS-14 expanded label. It the price/lb is used from the item file it will be wrong if the price has been change since the label was printed Actual Results: Using price/ lb from the item file which if changed will make the receipt look and calculate wrong. |
|
| WD 9801 |
RSS-14 Expanded Weight Label Displays incorrectly on Receipt Scenario:. -- Set up item 9005161100113 in the PLU file with a price of $3.49 and flag as a weighed item - Make sure your scanner can read RSS-14 expanded labels before doing the test - Start the order and scan the label - The information on the receipt looks correct - Change the price of the PLU in the item file to $1.25 - Start another order and scan the label - The correct price and weight is picked up from the label but the 1.25/ lb is picked up from the item file making the receipt appear to calculate wrong. Expected Results: I believe that a price/lb should be calculated based on the price and weight embedded in the RSS-14 expanded label. It the price/lb is used from the item file it will be wrong if the price has been change since the label was printed Actual Results: Using price/ lb from the item file which if changed will make the receipt look and calculate wrong. |
|
| WD 10107 |
Scenario: 1.Build a Delayed Level Promotion with Group Type = Units and Reward Type = Cash Set Level 1 Quantity = 2 and Reward = 1.00 and attach a 1 dollar item to the promotion 2.Ring in 2 of the items and than press Total and the 1 dollar will be subtracted 3.Press Clear and than void 1 of the 2 items and the subtotal changes to 0.00 Press Total again and the balance changes to -1 dollar Press Clear and Total again and the balance changes to 1 dollar Expected Results: Transaction Total should be 1 dollar Actual Results: 3 different Balance Due amounts (8.1.3.2-050) |
|
| WD 10111 |
ECCA Check Count Not Incrementing Scenario: 1. Setup ECCA template, Check tender, and Control checks as shown in screen shots. 2. Ring up transaction for $50 3. Tender out with a check 4. Ring up transaction for $50 5. Tender out with another check form the same account Expected Results: System should popup a control check for going over 1 check per day. Actual Results: System allows you to run the second check without a problem Another side effect we found was that if you rang up a third transaction which puts the daily total for that check account over $200 it won't popup a control, though if you do a transaction for $200.01 it will give you the control check. |
|
| WD 10113 |
When using the TPG printer with OPOS driver
the application is not detecting accounts marked as bad in Bad Accounts
and ECCA
|
|
|
WD 10124 |
U-Scan The signature is captured correctly on the PIN pad if Store\POST\general\display captured signature on cashier display with accept or reject is No. If you have Yes for the setting, the signature will not be captured on U-Scan and the signature copy will print at the attendant station. Set Store\POST\general\display captured signature on cashier display with accept or reject to Yes. Ring an order at the U-Scan customer station running with a PIN pad 4100 or 4250 Select Pay Now and tender with Credit Slide your credit card when prompted Sign the PIN pad when displayed The U-Scan Attendant station flashes to confirm the signature (Go into direct mode) Select Yes to confirm the signature displayed The signature from the PIN pad is not captured and the signature copy to sign is then printed at the attendant station. Expected Results: Signature capture should work with the display signature at cashier display with accept or reject set to Yes Actual Results: If set to Yes, the signature will be rejected and a printed credit receipt is printed to sign at the attendant station (8.1.3.2-050) |
|
| WD 10305 |
Coupon text lines do not print when using the OPOS Generic driver with H6000 and TPG 776 printers Scenario: 1. TP3K with TPG 776 USB printer 2. V8 setup for coupon - Store\Post|Monetary\Coupons\Printing - Coupon printing in use = Yes 3. V8 setup for coupon - System Administration\POS Setup\POS Parameters\Coupon Parameters\ Coupon Printing Maintenance: A) General tab - Coupon in use is checked, PLU = #1, Select Item = Found, Print Barcode is checked Barcode = 20000000015, Ticket amount to print coupon = 0.01 B) Coupon Line tab - 1st line = Hi, 2nd line = 2-41010-01500-8, 3rd line = Goodbye 4. V8 setup for post - System Administration\POS Setup\POS Configuration\POS Configuration A) Select the TP3K configuration B) WinPoS H/W tab - Printer Type = OPOS Generic, Use OPOS = Yes C) E-Ticket-OPOS tab = OPOS Printer Driver Name = A776 5. Sign on, ring up PLU #1, tender order 6. Change printer to H6000 USB 7. V8 setup for post - System Administration\POS Setup\POS Configuration\POS Configuration A) Select the TP3K configuration B) WinPoS H/W tab - Printer Type = OPOS Generic, Use OPOS = Yes C) E-Ticket-OPOS tab = OPOS Printer Driver Name = TM-H6000IIU 8) Same results on V8.1.3.0_041 and V8.1.2.1_090 Expected Results: Coupon prints with barcode and text Actual Results: Coupon prints with barcode but no text is printed, just two (2) lines of dashes NOTE - Same results with either Axiohm 776 USB or Epson H6000 USB printers when using the OPOS Generic driver. If, when using the Epson H6000 USB printer you change the Printer type in the post configuration to Epson H6000 the coupon prints correctly. Conclusion: The issue is the OPOS Generic printer driver not the printer |
|
| WD 10318 |
After setting the PLU(s); testing with gift cards with the same and different #'s. Also tried different prices, different cards, and even created cards #'s. The issue is: When scanning multiple gift cards in a transaction and hitting total, then going into tender mode, then backing up into sales mode ad doing a line void(as long as it is not done from the bottom up) it will activate 1 of the gift cards no matter what. I tested this on version 8.1.3.0-041. It does not matter if there are items included on the order or not. Barcode #'s used: "0767514488850000000003108938" & "0767514488850000000003108940". Scenario: 1. Scan gift card #1. 2. Scan gift card #2. 3. Total the transaction. 4. Select any tender type. 5. Exit form tender mode, back into sale mode. 6. Void Line item voiding gift card #1 (Not starting from the bottom). 7. Void Gift Card #2. 8. Reselect any tender type. 9. Finalize the sale out. Expected Results: The transaction is ended. Actual Results: Transaction ends, but 1 of the gift cards activates no matter what. |
|
| WD 10332 |
The Grand Total figure is too large when the report is run for a range of days - the total figure is the sum for all days included in the report range Scenario: 1.Run a Store Balance Report for each day for the last 7 days and check the Grand Total figure on each report 2.Run a Store Balance Report for a weekly period and check the Grand Total figure Expected Results: The Grand Total figure should be the same on both reports and should be the amount from the last day of the week Actual Results: The Grand Total figure will be the sum of all 7 days included in the report |
|
| WD 10348 |
When a customer uses a gift card to partially pay for a balance, then uses a credit/debit card to pay the remainder, the credit/debit card is declined because the POS system is sending the gift card information to MTX for a second time. It is not releasing the gift card information in order for the debit/credit information to go through. PLEASE NOTE: another scenario to freeze PIN pad that requires a fix and testing: This same problem occurs when trying to tender a order with a gift card with 0 balance. PIN pad just hangs with processing. And cashier gets over limit 50 error, Before upgrade we would receive a zero balance on PIN pad. Scenario: 1. Cashier rings up order and TOTAL key is hit. 2. Gift card is tendered for part of the total. 3. The gift card amount is removed from the total and the gift card 4. Credit/Debit tender is then used for the remainder of the total 5. POS system receives a Decline message from MTX for the credit/debit tender Expected Results: Gift card is processed for part of the total. Credit/Debit is accepted for the remainder of the total. Actual Results: According to MTX, the POS is not calling for reset to the OpenEPS.dll and instead calls a new transaction using the gift card data no he credit/debit tender. This results in the debit/credit tender being declined. (8.1.3.2-050) |
|
| WD 10533 |
POST is unavailable for 45 minutes on 24 Hour Fuel Stores while trying to run EOD because of Fuel polling. Added a System Parameter under Front Office\End Of Day\General that allows you to specify the number of minutes that the EOD waits for the POS systems to start their EOD. |
|
| WD 10542 |
PLU Not on File Report not cutting receipt after printing at end of transaction Scenario: 1.Set up General System Parameters to print a plu Not on File report 2.ring up an item that is Not on File 3.manually enter a price and department to ring up the item 4.finalize the transaction Expected Results: receipt will print out and cut and then the Not on File receipt will print and cut Actual Results: the Not on File receipt is not cut so it is included as part of the next transactions receipt (8.1.3.2-050) |
|
|
WD 10573 WD 10632 |
Some PAP transactions are not being finalized If sale is over preauth amount. Authorized for 50$ pumps 45$ Car wash for 8$ "loses" transaction. Please see notes for explanation INC 554976. MTXlinsrv 2.0.0.2 Pumpsrv 4.0.16.150 Routesrv 3.0.0.5 (8.1.3.2-050) |
|
| WD 10635 |
POS linked to checkout bank using Sign Off setting in General System Parameters rather than Secure in Checkout Bank settings. POST Linked to checkout bank, Checkout bank parameters Secure 4 minutes, GSP Sign Off 1 minute causing the POST to sign off? Scenario: 1. POST Configuration link POST to Checkout Bank 2. In Checkout Bank Maintenance set to Secure after 4 minutes. 3. Set General System Parameter to Sign Off after 1 minute. Expected Results: POS will secure after 4 minutes Actual Results: POS signs off. |
|
| WD 10645 |
Fuel - Reprint of receipt not cutting receipt |
|
| WD 10699 |
Enhanced Promotion (Department Discount) not calculating properly at POS terminal. Also, promotional items and promotional discounts are printing a "1" to the left of the price field. 1. Create PLU 201 - Salad Greens Assign PLU 201 to Produce Department Price = $ 6.00 Quantity = 1 Food Stamp = Yes 2. Create PLU 203 - Hass Avocado Assign PLU 201 to Produce Department Price = $ 1.99 Quantity = 1 Food Stamp = Yes 3. Create an Enhanced Promotion with the following attributes: Non-netted Flag = Yes Attachment = Produce Department Group Type = By Value Reward Type = Percentage Off Percentage = 10.00 Minimum Purchase = .01 Threshold Amount = .01 2nd Threshold Amount = .01 4. Ring up the items in the following order: Ring PLU 201 ($6.00 - Get $.60 Promotion) Ring PLU 201 ($6.00 - Get $.60 Promotion) Ring PLU 201 ($6.00 - Get $.60 Promotion) Ring PLU 203 ($1.99 - Get $.20 Promotion) Ring PLU 203 ($1.99 - Get NO Promotion) Ring 1.00 Grocery Press Total (Now you receive the $.20 Promotion for second PLU 203 above.) Also, notice on cashier display and receipt, a "1" is printing by each item in this promotion - not sure where this is coming from. |
|
| WD 10770 |
Pos-Pump Value 0n Pump Reading Report By Value contains no values. Scenario: 1.Do a PAP transaction. 2.Look at CUR_FUEL_VAL_TRANS_PUMP, VALUE_SOLD field it contains <NULL> Expected Results: CUR_FUEL_VAL_TRANS_PUMP VALUE_SOLD should show the amount of the sale. Actual Results: CUR_FUEL_VAL_TRANS_PUMP VALUE_SOLD just shows <NULL> (8.1.3.2-050) |
|
| WD 10817 |
VISTA loaded ISS45 on an Acer VM661 Mid-tower running Vista Business and SQL Server 2005 for Workgroup. When the PC is restarted at the end of the installation, the HASP driver is not loaded by Vista. A new Aladdin HASP driver which is supported by Vista has to be put into the ISS45 software. ISS45 will somehow have to test the O/S to determine if it needs to use the old HASP or the HASP for Vista. Scenario: Using the Acer VM661 Mid-tower loaded with Microsoft Vista Business and SQL Server 2005 does not recognize the current Aladdin HASP driver. You can go into Microsoft device manager and see that the driver for the HASP does not load. A new Vista support Aladdin HASP driver has to be put into the V8 software. |
|
| WD 10818 |
VISTA Trying to run a report (like Department report) on V8.1.3.2 on a Microsoft Vista Business O/S with SQL server 2005 workgroup is popping up the following: 42000: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]The SELECT permission was denied on the object 'syscatefories', database 'msdb', schema 'dbo'. Scenario: 1. Install V8.1.3.2 on an MFS1 server running Microsoft Vista Business and SQL Server 2005 workgroup. Run a department report and you will get the popup above |
|
| WD 10819 |
VISTA During the installation of V8.1.3.2 on MFS2 running XP Pro, the point where you try to connect to the remote machine name (which happen to be running Vista Business and SQL server 2005) is showing a popup (Severe Can not connect to remote 'MFS1-Vista' <<***FYI - this is the computer name of my MFS1**>> machine or required information can not be retrieved!!! Scenario: 1. Load the MFS1 with Microsoft Vista Business, SQL Server 2005 and V8.1.3.2. Load the MFS2 with Microsoft XP Pro and during the installation of V8.1.3.2, you will get the error above. |
|
| WD 10820 |
VISTA Load V8.1.3.2 on MFS1 running Microsoft Vista Business and SQL Server 2005 workgroup. When restarting the PC, looking at the GENERAL tab on Services Monitoring does not show any of the information in the window. Clicking any tab along the top (GENERAL, RSMSRV, TRANS, QDX32, TRANSCLI, SRVBAT, SQL, APP) does not change the viewing screen to the tab position. If you click in the white area of the screen, the screen will change but still you will not see any data. Note: The following data is the only thing that may show in the GENERAL display area of the Services Monitoring window later but nothing else is displayed. Time APP PosSvMon: Regional Settings date format mdy |
|
| WD 10821 |
VISTA Ran the End of Day on the MFS1 VISTA Business running SQL Server 2005. During the end of day, both MFS1 & MFS2 get connection issues to SQL. I found that just after the DBCC check of the databases master, mssglsystemresource, msdb that the SQL server gets a (Server shut down by NOWAIT request from login sa) when I viewed the Application Event Viewer. You also get a POPUP for V8MainDll that says the following: Devp Error In Module Main: Number : 0 Description: Cannot Connect to DataBase Server Source: Context: Gutils.dll - DBSrv Scenario: 1. Load V8.1.3.2 on the MFS1 running Microsoft Vista Busines and SQL Server 2005. Ring up normal orders and then do the End of Day. During the end of day, you get ODBC communication link failure on MFS2 and MFS1 can not connect to SQL also at this point. Looking at the Application Event Viewer is showing during the end of day that SQL is getting a Server shut down by NOWAIT request from login SA |
|
|
WD 10885 WD 11035 |
When a transaction is declined from WinEPS some declines have the option to manager override the decline. For example, If running on Demo host and $6.00 is tendered check, it will decline from the bank and on version 8.1.2.1 it would allow the checker to input a manager�s override manually. Now in 8.1.3.2-015, it is no longer leaving the override box on the POS, it will display it briefly and then take whatever checker is signed into the POS as a managers id, and override the velocity check from WinEPS. This was detected in version 8.1.3.0-050, i also duplicated it in 8.1.3.2-015, and verified it worked in 8.1.2.1 Scenario: 1. verify WinEPS is on DEMO host, response codes are set, and WinEPS is set for "pos validation" 2.Sign into POS as checker with no privileges 3.ring in exactly $6.00 to trigger the NR response code from WinEPS to give a decline on the pos 4.Tender with Check 5.Message is displayed on POS saying declined 6.Clear the declined message 7.WinEPS displays on POS a velocity message 8. Chose OK---at this point you should be able to input a managers id to override--but the box goes away and automatically takes the checkers id as a managers id. Expected Results: Managers Override box stays displayed on the POS, for the checker to input a manager�s id to override the bank decline velocity message. Actual Results: in 8.1.3.2-015 the box is displayed but quickly disappears because the POS passed to WinEPS the checker number (with no privileges) as a manager. This can be verified in the JRNL file and WPEFT log. |
|
| WD 10896 |
FUEL - With "Price Change On Discount " set in Allied Registry and a Cents off Voucher is scanned and the price reduced at the pump and then you cancel the transaction the pumps do not reset to the original price and the next customer gets the gas at the reduced price also the voucher can be used again. Scenario: 1. Create Cents off voucher. 2. Scan a Credit card at the pump (Gilbarco simulator). 3. Respond Yes to the prompt for a voucher and scan the voucher. Se that the price at the pump is reduced. 4. Then press cancel to abort the sale. 5. Then start another transaction and this sale is at the reduced price. Expected Results: When the order is canceled the pumps should reset to the original price. Actual Results :After the cancel the pumps maintain the discount price until you run another sale. |
|
| WD 10921 |
FUEL WinPoS crashes when performing a reprint receipt for a Pay at Pump transaction. This issue only occurs when running version 4.1.16.777 of CL2PumpSrv.exe. Scenario: 1.Load system with 8.1.2.1-090 with CL2PumpSrv.exe version 4.1.16.777 2.Perform a Pay at Pump transaction 3.At the register perform a reprint receipt transaction for the completed pay at pump transaction Expected Results: Duplicate receipt for the pay at pump transaction will print out at the register |
|
| WD 10922 |
FUEL WinPoS crashes when performing a reprint receipt for a Pay at Pump transaction. This issue only occurs when running version 4.1.16.777 of CL2PumpSrv.exe. Scenario: 1.Load system with 8.1.2.1-090 with CL2PumpSrv.exe version 4.1.16.777 2.Perform a Pay at Pump transaction 3.At the register perform a reprint receipt transaction for the completed pay at pump transaction Expected Results: Duplicate receipt for the pay at pump transaction will print out at the register Actual Results: WinPoS will crash to desktop |
|
| WD 10923 |
Price list maintenance, it allows me to APPLY a Department that does not exist. Scenario: 1. Go to Plu maintenance 2. Double click on Price list maintenance 3. Click on Rapid Entry 4. Key Plu 7, enter 0 or a Department that does not exist (in Department Maintenance) in the DEPARTMENT field. Hit ENTER or TAB and a message, "Department 35 Does Not Exist". 4. But if you hit APPLY, you will not get the same message (but user should). 5. At the pos Ring Plu 7 tender out with cash 6. Go to Department Report, Shows * * * * 035 department does not exist $24.00 Expected Results: should error display "Department does NOT exist" Actual Results: Allowed me APPLY a Department that does not exist. |
|
| WD 10927 |
Used the exit to DOS function on the POST. Started up POST again from the desktop and signed on. Got an error that indicated that the current printer can not work with OPOS. What I found is two copies of POSW32 running in the task manager. SHOULD HAVE received POPUP THAT TOLD ME THAT I HAD ANOTHER COPY OF POSW32 RUNNING AND DO I WANT TO TERMINATE IT. Scenario: - Used the exit to DOS function on the POST. - The ISS45 application shut down but failed to shut down the POSW32 in task manager - The next time I started up WinPoS, I got two running POSW32 showing in task manager and it created issues on the POST during signon. - WHAT SHOULD HAPPEN, IS THAT THE APPLICATION SHOULD POPUP SAYING ANOTHER COPY OF POSW32 IS RUNNING AND DO I WANT TO TERMINATE IT. Expected Results: WHAT SHOULD HAPPEN, IS THAT THE APPLICATION SHOULD POPUP SAYING ANOTHER COPY OF POSW32 IS RUNNING AND DO I WANT TO TERMINATE IT. Actual Results: ISS45 is allowing multiple copies of POSW32 to run. |
|
| WD 10948 |
WinEPS is not picking up the account number for its reporting when TAC codes 9, 5, and 8 are set in the sequence instead of the U TAC code. Scenario: 1. Ring an order and tender with a check on an OPOS Epson 6000III printer WinEPS is not getting the check information. The journal from WinEPS is attached Expected Results: WinEPS should be getting account information from check with TAC codes 9, 5 and 8 Actual Results: WinEPS is not receiving account data |
|
| WD 10950 |
Call By Function feature is not working in Customer Survey Scenario: 1.Create a new Customer Survey question and set the Display At setting = Call By Function 2.On MFS1 create a new Keyboard Function = 1058 with description of Customer Survey 3.On the POST assign keyboard function 1058 to a key on the keyboard 4.On the POST press the Function 1058 key and you will see a red box prompting you to enter a question number - enter the number of the customer survey question you created in step 1 Expected Results: The selected customer survey question will be displayed and the application will wait for input from the cashier Actual Results :A yellow box is displayed saying the "Question selected is not Defined. This worked correctly in 8.1.3.0-037 and worked with a minor fluke in 8.1.3.0-050 (have to enter 100 for question 1, 200 for question 2 |
|
| WD 10962 |
Use the function called WPFUNC_MessageBoxM in V7 it returns the key code but in V8 it is defined as a VOID function Actual Results: The function is erroneously defined in V8 and should match V7 |
|
| WD 10971 | Issue with both V7 and V8 if you use either the 92R mag-card reader on V7 or the OPOS mag-card reader on V8 - it appears that the developers left in some code when they do their debugging and it appears that they are logging both track 1 and track2 data a log called WinPoS.log | |
| WD 11010 |
When suspending a Transaction from a U-Scan with activated gift cards they show up incorrectly when recalling them on another register
activated gift cards they show up incorrectly when recalling them |
|
| WD 11013 |
Frequent Shopper Dummy not working on U-Scan. Scenario: 1. Setup dummy frequent shopper. 2. Frequent shopper dummy card number = 48004376936 3. Automatic insert in all tickets = Yes 4. Print regular and frequent shopper price = Yes 5. Do not prompt Freq.Shopper at the beginning of a ticket = No 6. Create Item Price $5.00 QTY 1 Frequent shopper type = Discount Amount Value $2.00 7. At U-Scan Scan the item Expected Results: Will get F/Shopper discount |
|
| WD 11014 |
The default TAC code on the check in WinEPS are U, 6, 7, S, W, G, H, >, Z I rang an order and during the check tender selected Yes to manually enter the check. I keyed in the account#, routing# and check#. The check completed and on the customer receipt had the correct [K] by account, routing and check #'s. The WinEPS processed the check as if it was scanned and not keyed. Note: Using TAC codes 9, 8 and 5 instead of U is doing manual checks correctly. Scenario: Rang an order and during the check tender selected Yes to manually enter the check. I keyed in the account#, routing# and check#. The check completed and on the customer receipt had the correct [K] by account, routing and check #'s. The WinEPS processed the check as if it was scanned and not keyed. Expected Results: The information sent to WinEPS should be that the check is manually entered not scanned. This happens only when the U TAC code is used. Actual Results: A manually entered check is sent to WinEPS as a scanned checked and processed when using the U TAC code. |
|
| WD 11033 |
Rang up a $2.00 grocery item and tendered with $1.00 vendor coupon tender and $1.00 cash tender. The total for the order shows as $3.00 not $2.00. Scenario:. a. Set up the buffer print like the attached Buffer.jpg Make sure you give the Total sales text the name Total b. Ring $2.00 grocery Hit total The display shows Balance due 2.00 Hit Back Office Select Tender Select vendor coupon At the enter amount, enter 1.00 Tender the remaining 1.00 with cash
Expected Results: Total should be $2.00 Actual Results: Total is printing as @3.00 |
|
| WD 11034 |
If you POST void a transaction that has an EPS tender, and "Use WinEPS Receipt Data" is enabled in the system, the POST void does not actually void the transaction. Instead a yellow box appears, "TRANSACTION IS VOIDED!" and the POST void transaction is marked with bad records. This only occurs with Use WinEPS Receipt Data enabled. Scenario: 1. Ring Item 2. Tender with credit card 3. POST void the above transaction 4. Press YES to confirm the void and to confirm that the tender will have to be manually reversed. Expected Results: Transaction is voided. In TT you'll see a new transaction with the negative amount of the POST voided transaction. No void ticket or bad record flags are set on this or the original transaction. Actual Results: After pressing YES to POST void the transaction, a yellow box appears with the words "TRANSACTION IS VOIDED!". Though it appears that the POST void may have completed, looking at the transaction in TT you'll see that the bad record flag is set on the POST void, therefore it didn't actually void anything. The cashier is still accountable for the transaction. |
|
| WD 11035 |
When a transaction is declined from WinEPS some declines have the option to manager override the decline. For example, If running on Demo host and $6.00 is tendered check, it will decline from the bank and on version 8.1.2.1 it would allow the checker to input a manager�s override manually. Now in 8.1.3.2-015, it is no longer leaving the override box on the POS, it will display it briefly and then take whatever checker is signed into the POS as a managers ID, and override the velocity check from WinEPS Scenario: 1. verify WinEPS is on DEMO host, response codes are set, and WinEPS is set for "pos validation" 2.Sign into POS as checker with no privileges 3.ring in exactly $6.00 to trigger the NR response code from WinEPS to give a decline on the pos 4.Tender with Check 5.Message is displayed on POS saying declined 6.Clear the declined message 7.WinEPS displays on POS a velocity message 8.chose OK---at this point you should be able to input a managers ID to override--but the box goes away and automatically takes the checkers id as a managers ID. Expected Results: Managers Override box stays displayed on the POS, for the checker to input a managers ID to override the bank decline velocity message. Actual Results: in 8.1.3.2-015 the box is displayed but quickly disappears because the POS passed to WinEPS the checker number (with no privileges) as a manager. |
|
| WD 11041 |
When an item on multiple promotions at a time and scan member card at the middle of order, the promotion calculates incorrectly. Scenario: REPROCESS TICKET AT LATE SWIPE SET = YES 1. Create plu: Department = Grocery, Price = $3.00, Qty = 1 2. Create 2 Enhanced promotion Buy one get one free: Group type = Units, Reward type = Free item, Reward = 1, Threshold = 2, Set attachment = Plu 30, Member card require = Checked 3. Create Enhanced Promotion $1.00 discount: Group type = Unit, Reward type = Cash, Reward = $1.00, Limit quantity = 1, Threshold 1, Member card required = Checked, Set attachment = Plu 30 4. Scan member card at beginning 5. Sell Plu 30 2 times you will get $1.00 discount and 1 buy one get one free Balance due $2.00 Your Saving Today is $4.00 (this is correct) 6. bypass Frequent Shopper prompt 7. Sell Plu 30 2 times you will get $2.00 Discount and 1 Buy one get one free Balance due $1.00 Your savings today $5.00 (this is incorrect) |
|
| WD 11046 |
The touch screen and the response from the IBM 300, 500 and 700 are slow after upgrading to 8.1.3.2-050. Scenario: 1. Load IBM POST with 8.1.3.2-050 and use the total touch. The response takes 10 seconds or more to respond to the touch. **** As a work around to the issue it was found if you change the Hardware_Type=IBM to Hardware_Type=Other that the issue will disappear. Expected Results: The WinPoS.ini file should have the line Hardware_Type=IBM and operate at a normal speed. Actual Results: After upgrading the IBM POST with the WinPoS.ini file having the line Hardware_Type=IBM, the IBM POST response is very slow. |
|
| WD 11047 |
Not able to recall the transaction at the lane when reprocess ticket at late swipe on.: Scenario: 1. Set Reprocess ticket at late swipe = Yes 2. Bypassed Frequent Shopper Prompt 3. Sell $5.00 Grocery 4. Scan Member Card 5. Save transaction 6. Recall transaction Expected Results: Recall transaction normally. Actual Results: Failed to recall transaction |
|
| WD 11050 |
U-Scan lane is able to SAVE and RECALL an order with a partial EBT Tender Scenario: 1.On a U-Scan lane ring up some items that are food stampable 2.Partially tender the transaction with an EBT Food Stamp tender 3.Attempt to SAVE the transaction to be recalled later Expected Results: U-Scan lane will not allow the transaction to be saved and will display a message saying TENDER APPROVED! CAN NOT SAVE\VOID TICKET as happens on a regular POST Actual Results: U-Scan lane will SAVE the ticket |
|
| WD 11051 |
StoreNext Fuel version 8.1.3, WinPoS running on the PFS will Crash. Trscache qdx 152 appears to run full causing WinPoS on the PFS to crash WinPoS log will show the following error[0/10/2008 09:26:10.593] FATAL ERROR: TRANSACTION WRITE PROBLEM!!!! |
|
| WD 11058 |
Points redemption doesn't work Scenario: 1. Set member card 2. Link the member card to the scheme you are about to set up 3. Define the scheme as shown in the attached file 4. Set up the parameters under Store/Post/Operational/Member card/Redemption as shown it the attached file 5. Make sure the parameter "Suppress printing points on receipt is set to = No 6. Set the enhanced promotion as shown in the attached file 7. Run promotion item and tender out with Cash 8. Run end of day. 9. After end of day scan member card and sell $5.00 grocery 10. At the end of the ticket , when hitting total, the pos application displays a message asking whether to use rewards or not. Expected Results: Message display Use Rewards Yes or No Actual Results: The message to use rewards never shows up. |
|
| WD 11121 |
Getting "Run-Time error 94, Invalid use of Null," and "Run-time error "429" ActiveX component can't create object" errors when trying to add the same item twice in a Fast PLU batch Scenario: 1. Create a new Fast PLU Batch 2. Add one plu as an update 3. Try to add the same plu as an update again. Expected Results: ISS45 should not allow the same plu to be added to the batch again, it should either edit the preexisting entry for that plu (Which is how normal PLU Batches behave) or not allow the plu to be accessed at all. Actual Results: When you attempt to add the same PLU again, get multiple errors in ISS45, forcing the user to close out of ISS45 entirely before it will operate correctly |
|
| WD 11123 |
The tenders that use card ranges which work in 8.1.3.0 are not working in 8.1.3.2. You are always getting a yellow popup that says INVALID ACCOUNT No.
|
|
| WD 11172 |
Fuel - new 1016 modules with 8.1.3.2 - reprint on PAP does not do a cut after reprint Scenario: Fuel system do a Pay at Pump and then reprint the original transaction. It will print but does not cut the receipt. |
|
| WD 11261 |
Fast Plu batch display incorrect price. Scenario: 1. Select under Menu Builder and Link User "Select Module To Assume Decimal Places" Checked Plu Management 2. Plu maintenance Create Plu 2030, Price $4.90 Qty 1 3. Go to Fast Plu batches and create a new batch Clicked on the "Batch Item Button" and enter the PLU 2030 then hit enter 4. Looked at the PRICE/ QUANTITY field the price shows as "5" 5. Then Clicked on Change Price Reason field the price now changed to $0.05 |
|